Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 replies - 16 through 27 (of 27 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Owner and Proxy attends AGM in person #27741

    An update on this bizzare situation I now find myself in.

    I have been advised that the owner who is bringing along her Proxy to speak on her behalf now wants to bring along another “support” person (friend) to the meeting.

    This situation is getting out of hand and is becoming a bit of a circus.

    Clearly she is trying to dominate the upcoming meeting.

    We will be adopting the Standing Orders as our first item of business.

    However do we need to tolerate/accept that this extra person attending the meeting who has no connection to the owners/strata/residents other than as a friend to the owner in question.

    Surely as the Chair I am able to stop this situation before the meeting date and tell this owner that this is unacceptable and only herself and/or her Proxy can attend the AGM.

    in reply to: 10 Year Capital Works Forecast Plan #27607

    I think my question is quite clear!

    Im quering about the Capital Works (Sinking) Plan for the common property in a strata building.

    Research via the internet is fruitless for guidelines/samples to use as a guide for a first timer.

    Regional NSW quantity surveyors in my area are NOT prepared to professionally complete a CWP on our behalf. They’ve shown no interest in providing this particular service at all. Limited by the small number of surveyors in our country area.

    To go to another town to get a surveyor to professionally prepared this CWP report will cost more due to the extra travelling involved.

    Which is why Im coming up against some resistance from the other owners to go further afield.

    So….who else can do these Capital Works Plans?

    in reply to: Review of Schedule 2 By Laws for old scheme #27526

    Thank you Jim!

    in reply to: Review of Schedule 2 By Laws for old scheme #27512

    Thanks Jim.

    in reply to: Review of Schedule 2 By Laws for old scheme #27498

    Thanks Jim.

    Just to clarify the wording of this motion for the agenda.

    THAT The Owners Strata Plan No.xxxxxx (the “Owners Corporation”) by SPECIAL RESOLUTION, pursuant to Section 141 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015, adopt the Schedule 3 Model By-Laws in the 2016 Strata Scheme Management Regulations.

    in reply to: Owner and Proxy attends AGM in person #27391

    Thanks Jimmy for your valuable input.

    Im going to be making the adoption of your list of Standing Orders as the first item of business on the agenda.

    You are spot with your comment in regards to the owner & non owner from one Lot’s ongoing attempt to dominate, bully, intimidate, harass etc.

    Its a very bizzare situation that we are in, one that I have never experience before.

    They have upped the ante since Ive taken over the management of the Strata Plan, as Ive refused to be bullied and intimidated by this one owner and the non owner.

    It gives me greater confidence in tackling this unique situation we are in.

    Your advice has been invaluable to me, so thank you very much!

    in reply to: Neighbours split over dividing fence #27379

    Hi Jimmy,

    It is the boundary fence between two neighbouring properties.

    Most of the fences in the neighbourhood are in colorbond. We are in the minority with a timber paling fence.

    Our neighbour already has a colorbond boundary fence on the other side of their property.

    The issue is a deadlock within our OC.

    On the plan it appears as a solid thick line.

    After advising the owners of their responsibility to maintain the fence, the type of fencing used in our neighbourhood, and our neighbour’s request for colorbond, the number of quotes that I have provided to them shows the same costings for both timber & colorbond (local fencing specialists prefers colorbond)….there is still no compromise.

    It is very difficult to effectively managed this scheme at times. ????

    in reply to: Courtyard Fencing Replacement Issues #27252

    We recently had a Tribunal Hearing (NSW) where the Tribunal member stated that the Dividing Fences Act only relates to two owners of adjacent lands and not to two lot owners on a parcel of land.

    The Tribunal member stated that this is covered under the Strata Law and he suggested getting advice from a lawyer that specialised in Strata Law as he is not able to comment at this point of time and adjourned the hearing for a future fixed date.

    He did suggest that we install a fence on the inside of our courtyard fencing line in whatever material we like at our own cost. Even after stating our Strata By Law where the appearance of the external building must be in keeping with the rest of the building, the tribunal member stated that different materials can sometimes happen

    I’m flabbergasted by his response.

    So now we’ve decided to install a colorbond fence just inside our fencing line at our own cost.

    I’ve decided that I have had enough of self managing this small scheme lot and I’m in the process of sourcing proposals from professional Strata Managers to take over.

    I need my life back!

    in reply to: Even split of committee members #27194

    Thank you Jimmy,

    Another question for you.

    I anticipate an interesting AGM coming up!

    As the current Chairperson, how do I keep control of the meeting and focus on the motions on hand.

    We have two divisive/argumentative people. (One is an owner and the other is a Proxy Holder) and they always high jack the meeting. At our last EGM – two owners walked out of the meeting in disgust because of the behaviour of these two.

    I need the other owners to stay for the duration of the meeting so we can get things voted on.

    Can I ask these two to leave the meeting after giving them a warning?

    There doesn’t seem to be anything in the Strata Law that I can find that relates to the behaviour of meeting attendees.

    Can you please shed some light on this for me please?

    in reply to: Even split of committee members #27165

    Hi Flat Chat,

    Can you please clarify our unique situation please.

    I’m in NSW and I self manage a small scheme (6 Lots), and I currently hold all three positions on the SC.

    I’ve managed to get all six owners interested in attending our upcoming AGM/SC meeting.

    All six owners have expressed interest in becoming a SC member.

    However there appears to be two groups forming within our scheme.

    What happens if there is an even/tie vote for two people wanting the one position when the election of the Office Bearer’s takes place at the SC?

    Even if we do a poll vote – the UE is equal.

    What happens next?

    in reply to: Courtyard Fencing Replacement Issues #27063

    Hi Jim, unfortunately no…6 Lots with same EU…3 voted for timber and the other three for colorbond. 

    in reply to: Courtyard Fencing Replacement Issues #27060

    Hi JimmyT, Do you know what options are available to our OC when we cant get a majority vote on what fencing materials to use. Not replacing “like” for “like”, as we currently have lattice screens as courtyard dividing fences, which has been deemed as insufficient and provides no security or privacy for the residents. Thanks.

Viewing 12 replies - 16 through 27 (of 27 total)