Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 25 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Lot gate (formerly common property) needs repair #61717
    taps
    Flatchatter
    Chat-starter

      Thank you for the advice. Committee is evaluating this wk. Will get quotes, will get advice about amending bylaw, will request courtyd is cleaned up. Shame we all have courtyds some of us 2! this is only one in bad state, & the biggest one, which is used as selling point.
      Again yr responses are appreciated.

      in reply to: Lot gate (formerly common property) needs repair #61621
      taps
      Flatchatter
      Chat-starter

        Thank you Jimmy T. To get owner and or next owner, we need to change the bylaw, can this be added too or amended or do we need new by law?

        in reply to: Lot gate (formerly common property) needs repair #61614
        taps
        Flatchatter
        Chat-starter

          Thank you, the bylaw granting only states demolition of wall, removal of debris & reinstate gate across path, but within lot. Albeit the column holding latch was rebuilt against the Besser brick fence. Doesn’t say lot owner responsible for upkeep. But we do have another bylaw stating appearance of lot all lot owners much keep their lot in good state of repair and clean. Said courtyd is a mess clearly not used.
          Thank you both again for yr advice, looks like it defaults to SP.

          in reply to: Strata Plan Monies in Investment Account #58173
          taps
          Flatchatter
          Chat-starter

            thank you both for your replies.

            i should have been clearer in what i wrote.  the interest earned in this account for the year was 106.00 (0.0500pa).

            the only other expense on the tax return was the cost of doing the tax return at 283.00 via the tax agent being part of the Strata Managers company.

            we had to pay the ATO 177.00.  How wonderful it would have been if we earnt 800 to 850. but alas no that is not the case.  therefore keeping this account is costing the SP money.  like i said 10 years ago it would have been better interest rate, but now no.  interest rates are next to nothing.

            what irks me is that not only did the other owners notice this – nor was this bought up by the strata manager at the AGM do we need this investment account.  but being the cynical person i am it’s a benefit to the SM to keep the account as they are the tax agent.

            the benefit of the investment account is minus for our SPlan.

            in reply to: Leaking shower recess in a townhouse #58131
            taps
            Flatchatter

              Our SP is in NSW – our SP is all townhouses.  All bathrooms are on the first and or second level.  Our property is pre-1974 because of this we got advice from a strata lawyer.  We had courtyard issues as well with water seepage, so had that cleared up at same time. Unfortunately before we got the advice, monies were spent on bathrooms that we shouldn’t have.  Said advice letter was copied and sent to all owners and is in our AGM papers every year.  For us the only two issues the SP is responsible for piping in the riser in the common property wall and water pipes to the shower if they are in the common property wall.  If your property is after 1974 it’s worth getting legal advice, this gives your SP and your Strata Manager the proper information.

              taps
              Flatchatter
              Chat-starter

                Thank you Jimmy – the response to the question very much appreciated.  Will let the committee know.  Regards Taps

                 

                in reply to: Why are our water rates so high? #44986
                taps
                Flatchatter

                  Yes we too would like to know if Waterfix Strata in NSW has been to a property in NSW.  We are 20 units with about 50ppl incl 13 kids.  We are about $8.5 to 9k per year water rates (not including usual charges per unit).  we do have gardens but not everyone waters…. and looking at the chart above we too are way over.

                  thank you

                  in reply to: Dubious checks lead to insurance bill #31130
                  taps
                  Flatchatter

                    Thank you scotlandax – so we were in a position of knowledge I called icare and explained to the Customer rep the above her advice and those of her supervisor no our strata plan is not an ’employer’ they sent to me a link which you put in very simple details and the algorithm tells you yes or no  – said link was for the State Insurance Regulatory Auth.  So called them again was told no – workers comp not needed.  Sent email to SM and other persons of authority at the SM- explaining the above contact and enclosing the links, the emails received from ‘the powers that be’ mentioned above.  The person of authority after 2 days send the committee an email apologising for the error and refund of monies and policy cancellation.  I could elaborate on the SM taking such a ‘blanket’ approach’ to the necessity of WC – but won’t. 

                    in reply to: Poll: What annoys you most about your neighbours? #31086
                    taps
                    Flatchatter

                      Owners who do nothing to help not even pick up paper at the mailbox and but in bin, but are happy to complain to other owners or SM about, the committee, but won’t be a committee member because there life is too busy!  

                      in reply to: Towed away: Slack parker finds car gone #31066
                      taps
                      Flatchatter

                        when living in Lane Cove we had 4 visitor spaces that were repeating being used by our neighbours and our tenants even to the point of having one tenant put a car cover on her car and leave car for weeks we left notes polite, strata manager sent a letter, still no movement so we put note with brick saying move this car and do not return or the brick will be inside your car next time…. that did the trick.  

                        there was also a tow truck driver who lived across the road who had trouble getting his truck into the space on his property and would park on the street but with parking a premium in Lane Cove, so at all hours he would use our visitor parking – again notes both rude and polite- lipstick on the drivers side window. enter the trusty brick but this time with glued old keys – he had a bright shiny red tow truck, brick – note – keys – well this did the trick,  asking this towie to not park was not an option…. *shiver, yuk*

                        in reply to: Do I really need a by-law for my new bathroom? #30530
                        taps
                        Flatchatter

                          Morning,

                          thank you Jimmy – your words are much appreciated.  Have copied out what you have said and will discuss with the other committee members.  then approach maybe another strata lawyer.  given that our building is getting older we on the committee think it’s just silly not to have a ‘blanket by-law’ that will suit our building.  i think its too late for the present owner who wants to renovate but moving forward this should be something our Plan needs.  

                          in reply to: Do I really need a by-law for my new bathroom? #30525
                          taps
                          Flatchatter

                            Morning all,

                            Jimmy wrote above:-

                            It makes a lot of sense for your OC to create a one size fits all by-law for renovations like yours.  If they decline, tell them that you will make damned sure each of them pays full fare whenever they want to do work on their flats.  It’s time we stopped this rort (at worst) or laziness (at best) of demanding individual by-laws for identical work.

                            We are in NSW.  We have this issue at present – one new owner wants to renovate the bathroom (others have done so in the past and one owner has done so without permission) However.

                            We have a request from new owner to renovate their bathroom – our committee of 3 is fine with this.  We just need a detailed plan / time-frame etc. 

                            We have had our Strata Mgr say they need a by-law to do so – and we understand this however, when i spoke to XYZ Strata Lawyers that we would like to have a blanket by-law for bathroom renovations for the SP he said no –  as all bathrooms could be different and yes that will be so but what makes this worse is we are all townhouses with all bathrooms on the lst or 2nd level therefore within the lot (oh and we are pre 1974 – being strata’d in 1971).  the XYZ strata lawyer basically laughed at me for asking saying this just is not feasible to which i say why? it’s costing the new owner 700+ for the bylaw that will be the same for the next person who want’s to renovate and there will be others we know. 

                            What do we need to say to the XYZ strata lawyers to have them act on this on behalf of the our Strata Plan.  

                            in reply to: Owner replaced Common Property storm water pipe #29162
                            taps
                            Flatchatter
                            Chat-starter

                              Morning,

                              thank you scotlandx & kaindub will do …. 

                              regards

                              L

                              in reply to: Neglect becomes Owners Corp expense?? NSW #29035
                              taps
                              Flatchatter

                                Ah – yes the off-property owners who don’t worry about their investment and the R E Agents who take the money and don’t inspect.  

                                You could get a signed statement from the tenant to say this was reported to agent ??years ago and nothing done – & pics if the tenant sent them (especially as they are date stamped) then present to the owner and ask if they pay half or quarter cost of repair.  it may work.  

                                we had a townhouse in our complex tenanted over & over – the kitchen awning windows were not winding in so stuck open to the elements – the tenant said nothing, the owner didn’t visit, the agent was family didn’t visit,  consequently, the wood rotted and the glass in two panes nearly fell out.  when the committee got photo’s of really bad windows and frames we asked the tenant for a signed letter stating how long it had been like that (they didn’t care and they were moving out anyway). we had new windows quoted for put bill ($6k) & photo’s and statement the owners asked them to contribute (even though it’s strata) they did, as they wanted to do up townhouse and sell which they did. 

                                while it wasn’t ‘cricket’ to do so – it’s not fair on other property owners to foot the bill for negligent behaviour from agent and owner.  we do have a by-law that states that property must be kept in good repair.  (even if it’s strata).  & these windows were dangerous there was a piece of ply nailed to one window holding the bottom of the window frame to the side, had that not been there the glass would have dropped.  

                                in reply to: Courtyard Stairs #28548
                                taps
                                Flatchatter
                                Chat-starter

                                  Hi,

                                  thank you for your help – much appreciated.  it’s gone quiet for this last week, so maybe the owner has done some investigations of his own.  

                                  there is no thick line on the Strata Plans for these back stairs they don’t show at all.  we believe he will get legal advice and not take what the EC & Strata manager are saying.  

                                  will keep you posted if necessary.

                                Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 25 total)