Forums By-laws and outlaws Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #10991 Reply | Quote
    JC
    Flatchatter

      I’m not sure if this is the correct place for this question but any help would be appreciated….

      What is the legal implication of using the Strata Plan common seal?   On its own, does it mean the Owners Corporation have agreed, or does this mean something different.  Is the common seal valid without the signature of the Owners Corporation representatives on the same document? 

      Basically, is the document bearing the common seal without signatures a legally binding document?

    Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #26617 Reply
      Lady Penelope
      Flatchatter

        JC – There are many answers to your questions in the following articles.

        From my investigations it appears that the use of the common seal must be witnessed, however there is an allowance for non fraudulent mistakes in some circumstances. If there are no signatures and no completion of the Attestation then the document with the seal is unlikely to be legal.

        https://www.netstrata.com.au/the-common-seal-explained-and-wont-be-found-at-sea-world/

        Relevant sections in the SSMA 2015 are: sections 272, 273 of 

        https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/ssma2015242/index.html#s272

        In NSW there is an additional requirement from the NSW Govt Registrar General for consent attestation to be confirmed through the completion of Form 23: 

        https://rgdirections.lpi.nsw.gov.au/strata_schemes/approved_forms/approved_form_23

        https://rgdirections.lpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/215902/AF23_Attestation.pdf

        #26620 Reply
        JC
        Flatchatter
        Chat-starter

          Thanks LP – very useful, the netstrata article was directly relevant. 

          Have you ever heard of a court order forcing an OC to affix the Common Seal to a document against the wishes of the Owners, ie where the owners had voted not to approve the document. 

          If there was a vote to approve the document (and so affix the Common Seal) would you expect this to be an Ordinary or Special Resolution, or would you expect the type of resolution to be determined by the subject matter of the document?

          To be even more vague (I need to be careful) if the primary purpose of the document was to lead to a secondary activity that definitely required a Special Resolution, would the initial approval (where the Seal is required) need a Special Resolution at this stage, or would you expect a second vote (Special Resolution) after the primary (Ordinary vote) purpose has been completed.

          Sorry to be so vague!!

          #26601 Reply
          Lady Penelope
          Flatchatter

            I was incorrect when I stated previously that “If there are no signatures and no completion of the Attestation then the document with the seal is unlikely to be legal.”

            It appears from the following extract from a 2009 article that: “Affixing the common seal of the Owners Corporation (“OC”) to any document turns that paper into evidence – evidence to the world the OC approves of and will be bound by whatever appears above the seal.” 

            https://www.ocn.org.au/sites/default/files/090805%20The%20Common%20Seal.pdf

            If there has been a genuine mistake made and the Common Seal has been affixed to a document without the proper authorisation by the OC then this matter should be corrected ASAP. 

            Incorrect and/or fraudulent use of the Common Seal breaches both the SSMA 2015, and the Corporations Act 2001. Penalties may apply.

            Perhaps you should phone the Office of Fair Trading and explain your dilemma and ask for their advice.

            In my opinion, approving the document would require a Resolution at a General meeting with the vote on the Resolution (either Ordinary or Special) to be according to the original subject matter of the document. 

            In the interests of transparency (and in case this ever needs to be brought to the attention of the Tribunal), Explanatory material may need to be added to the resolution that explains the mistake.

            From reading many Tribunal decisions over the years, the Tribunal recognises that mistakes can and do happen from time to time, however the Tribunal is unlikely to compound the mistake in the manner that you suggest. 

            The remainder is a bit too vague to comment on.

          Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
          Reply To: The Common Seal
          PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

          You can use BBCodes to format your content.
          Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

          Your information:




          Forums By-laws and outlaws Current Page