Forums Living in strata Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #11095 Reply | Quote
    Jimmy-T
    Keymaster

      If you are as tired of reading about Airbnb as I am of writing about them you won’t get past the end of this sentence.

      However, this week I was on the James Valentine show on ABC radio doing my usual Q&A on apartment living and we needed to talk about the recent Government decision NOT to give the Coure report on holiday letting its unqualified support.

      Predictably, we had no sooner finished taking a call – from a listener whose tenants had illegally sub-let their apartment on Airbnb with disastrous results  – than we got a text from a listener.


      You can hear the Flat Chat spot on
      Afternoons with James Valentine HERE.


      Whoever they were,  they certainly had the official Airbnb party line off pat. Badly behaved guests would be given bad ratings on the website, said the text.  Also, it continued, the majority of apartment owners want the right to do what they want with their homes.

      Ignoring the highly dubious effect of voluntary “ratings”, I have two problems with that last point.

      Firstly, we trade off the right to do exactly what we want with our homes when we agree to live in a place where we share the cost of cleaners, security, gardening, repairs and maintenance.

      We also share walls, ceilings, floors, lifts, front doors, hallways and car parks.  Why anyone with a brain  would think that is the same as owning a house in a quarter-acre block is beyond me.

      Also, the NSW government punched some very large holes in the “my home is my castle” myth in the new strata laws, not least in that 75 percent of owners can force the other 25 percent to sell their apartments to developers.

      But here’s another thing: if the majority of people want the “right” to do as they please with their units, why oppose a law that would require the support of 75 percent of owners to lock out holiday lets?

      To put it another way, even if only 25 percent of owners – rather than the purported majority – are in favour of holiday lets, then by-laws banning them will never pass.

      I rest my case.

      One thing that never rests is the constant flow of odd and interesting question that come through the Flat Chat Forum. here’s just a sample of this week’s brain teasers:

      • I thought I was getting a car park but it turns out to be a storage space and the strata manager says I can’t park my car in it. That’s HERE.
      • The strata manager says there needs to be a strata committee-only EGM before I can do my renovations. Is that right? That’s HERE.
      • Chairman is using “executive” powers to decide of common property maintenance. Is he allowed to do that? That’s HERE.
      • Fair Trading mediation may be compulsory and free but is it worth the effort? That’s HERE.
      • Drying laundry on the balcony – what exactly does “visible from outside the building” mean? That’s HERE.
      • Is it OK for the committee to use an online survey to decide on changes they want to propose? That’s HERE.

      By the time you read this there will be a heap of other questions and answers on the Flat Chat forum. Come on by and join in.

      If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
    Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #27037 Reply
      Millie
      Flatchatter

        At least with forced sales the 25% opposing get bought out/compensated.  This proposal leaves up to 25% trapped in a building with ‘mixed use’ – which is “fundamentally incompatible”, so say the repeated and consistent judgments of the NSW Land and Environment Court – plus having to pay hand over fist for extra costs associate with STRs.  

        Sell up/move on – costs around $100k?  Then three weeks later the committee in the new ‘home’ votes to accept STRs.

        Three ‘C’s of good Planning:  clarity, consistency, certainty.

        Community Groups already planning legal action against councils if residential suburbs are rezoned as ‘transit’ ares.  Same, same with some strata residents.

        Residential Housing is for Residents.  Homes aren’t hotels.  People have made purchases based on a property being a residential property.

      Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
      Reply To: Roundup: Radio chat exposes fatal flaw in holiday let case
      PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

      You can use BBCodes to format your content.
      Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

      Your information:




      Forums Living in strata Current Page