Forums The Professionals SCs and strata managers Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #11245 Reply | Quote
    Hamish
    Flatchatter

      I live in a two lot strata scheme from hell.  The other owner has sequestered the common area in front of their villa for exclusive use.  They have installed a 1500 high grey colorbond front boundary fence which is in complete contrast to the style of the two lots. It replaces a 1500 high paling fence.

      The compulsory managing agent has given approval for the front boundary fence which replaced a 1500 paling fence because an AGM in 1989 stated that the owners of each lot be responsible for the common area in front of their lot.  There was no approval given for the original fence in any minutes of meetings  There is no special by-law or registration of same regarding the exclusive use of the common property. 

      Does the lot owner have the right to build this boundary fence without permission and having a special by-law for exclusive use of common property?

    Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #27696 Reply

      It sounds like the other owner (and Strata manager) have confused “exclusive use” and “responsibility”.

      In order to have exclusive use, there must be a special resolution put at a meeting. See pages 41 and 32 of this document:

      https://www.fairtrading.nsw.gov.au/biz_res/ftweb/pdfs/About_us/Publications/ft045.pdf

      (presuming you are in NSW?)

      “A special resolution is a vote by unit
      entitlement. A motion can only be
      passed by special resolution at a properly
      convened general meeting, with no more
      than 25% of the votes cast against it. “

      In a two lot strata scheme, both owners would have to agree to the special resolution regarding exclusive use (unless they have a 75% unit allocation).

      By fencing the area they have pretty much given themselves exclusive use, which it seems they aren’t entitled to.

      I’d go back to the Strata Manager and point these provisions out, and demand that at least part of the fence goes so you can access the area. Or, an alternative may be that the other owner, having shown a determination to treat the land as their own, be required to purchase the land from the owners (you and themselves). You’ll have to then re-survey the land to show that that land belongs to the other unit owner (once they’ve bought it), but at least you’ll be compensated for it.

      Page 39 of the document linked above provides a dispute resolution scheme.

      #27698 Reply
      Jimmy-T
      Keymaster

        @Hamish said:
        Does the lot owner have the right to build this boundary fence without permission and having a special by-law for exclusive use of common property?  

        You have a compulsory manager appointed – presumably because of past dissent between owners.  The manager pretty much takes the role of the strata committee/owners corporation and, on the face of it, can approve minor changes to common property provided they don’t breach the by-laws.  

        If you have a by-law about additions to the exterior of the property being in keeping with the look of the building, then they have possibly over-stepped their boundaries.

        But what are we really talking about here? You have been denied access to the area in front of the other villa – but would you have ever used it anyway?

        The real issue is that as part of the owners corporation, you are responsible for maintenance of an area to which you have no access.  This is by no means unusual – apartment block balconies are common property but they are also exclusive use.

        I would consider approaching the other owner and manager and asking them to either remove the fence or submit a by-law for exclusive use, accepting responsibility for the maintenance of the area, to which you will not object.  They will allow you to do the same if you so desire.

        I realise you feel as if you have been robbed in some way but this may be an opportunity to formalise an informal agreement and make the land-grabber responsible for the land they have grabbed.

        And never forget the five words a lawyer loves to hear: “It’s a matter of principle.” 

        If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
      Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
      Reply To: SM has OK’d villa land grab
      PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

      You can use BBCodes to format your content.
      Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

      Your information:




      Forums The Professionals SCs and strata managers Current Page