Re: Cttt

Yes, I agree to all scathing criticisms of the CTTT. We have just received our “decision” from an “adjudicator” re our application to have a licensed manager appointed. He opens with a lengthy defense of himself and his “association” with the problematic person on our EC who is a member of their tribunal.Very odd-our main argument is the manipulation of the system within our strata and the lack of compliance with the SSMA, not who knows or doesn't know him.

The whole document demonstrates total bias and is in fact  insulting and dismissive of the owners who undertook the stress and work to put in a substantial application. Why would we bother if all was well? Of course there is nil criticism of HIS submission.

We do have better things to do with our lives and fed up with the dominance and control of one character who is a CTTT member and who has a negative impact on our investments and our lives.There is absolutely no reference to one of our main arguments being lack of compliance under s62 over maintenance; the issues of improperly conducted meetings and abuse are dismissed….and on it goes.There are many obvious errors with regard to facts on dates and file numbers.We are left wondering if all our attachments made it to his desk or is he just plain stupid!? Plus it took over 4 months to produce this paltry document.

We feel totally let down by the “system” and just want to sell up. Why should any owner be forced to feel that way??

Thank you to Jimmy for creating a forum for the many struggling strata owners!