› Forums › Common Property › Abusive over Abuse › Current Page
Further on my last post, would proof that the EC did not respond nor acknowledge the correspondence from owner regarding this matter constitute a dysfunctional EC, let alone the outstanding maintenance issues?
And the fact that this EC has given notice to the SM over 2 months ago. Doesn’t the EC need to advise the owners of an EGM to vote on who willl be the new strata manager? Shouldn’t they have presented us with this information and notification if they have investigated alternative SM’s by now? Only a couple of weeks to go until the 3 months notice they gave to our previous SM.
Not to mention the outstanding maintenance. Would need a EGM to agree to quotes for the work wouldn’t we? It should have been organised and ready for the AGM. But so should so much more in this complex.
The fact that the EC and owners decided to let the SM have 3 months notice has also left the owner harrassed by this EC member at a loss at to where or who to go to. The SM would not be inclined to be too concerned as they may not be managing the SP in a month or so. And who could blame them. And also, taking any action at this time, when a new SM would be required, may be seen to be “too hard” by the EC.
I had passed on to the EC that I felt that, despite my agreement that the SM was not attending to matters in this complex, we really needed to keep them until we could attend to necessary and essential maintenance works, they decided that they would give them notice. Giving notice to the SM seems to be the only matter they have attended to in the past 6 months!