Yeah, thanks Strugs and Jimmy.
Frankly I don’t know which way to go, and I know that its a play-on-words, but I was hoping for an “out” to Cl 49 by considering a requirement for Proprietors to seek and obtain the O/C’s consent for sub-leases only (i.e as opposed to prime leases).
The E/C didn’t contemplate that the O/C would ever refuse to grant its consent, but rather that Proprietors wouldn’t want to jump through that hoop, and that even if they did, the O/C could at least express its concerns before a sub-lease was consented.
Clutching at straws, but any further thoughts anyone?