OK …. I know what’s required and why under Sect 65(A) and please regulars, don’t faint in shock, but….
from a logical and common sense perspective, I can’t see the point in putting a Motion for a Special Resolution before the next General Meeting of tabs’ Plan, just so a Special By-Law can be drafted and registered to retrospectively consent to such a minor renovation (in the broader scheme of things) and thereby make all on-going maintenance and repairs of the renovated areas the responsibility of tabs and future Proprietors of that Lot, as opposed to the Owners Corporation (O/C).
In tabs‘ example, there’s enough case law, precident, guidelines, and common practice to substantiate any future decision of the O/C not to maintain anything other than the original tiles in the Lot.
So I’ll stick my neck out and advise that tabs does nothing.