Yes – in the example you give Jimmy, that is an example of the allocation being unreasonable at the outset.
There are examples of blatant skewing of entitlements, but Aquarian didn’t go into the details of why the minority believe they are unfair.
As I said, it is often the case that people think they are unfair, but they’re not. That is why you need to be pretty certain that the original allocation was unreasonable, otherwise you are wasting money in making the application.
Our strata manager told us of a scheme he runs where the penthouse which was about triple the size of a ground floor unit had an entitlement of 30, versus 90 for the ground floor unit. Now that is unreasonable.