SMO,
I totally agree with you (and the judge) about “must” and “must not”.
The problem is the Act doesn’t have any penalties for breach (as you have also pointed out previously).
The Act also doesn’t have a definition of “detailed”, so that is completely in the eye of the beholder.
Some ECs use that to manipulate.
Motion: To approve a certain project.
No design plans, no quotes, no costs. No details of the project.
But the agenda was “detailed” in that there was a separate motion to vote on.