Whale sorry about the confusion
I 100% agree with you on all issues bar one
You have given clear indication of the required rules that the EC should but did not follow THANKS
The next step is one that confuses me and clearly you are confused as to why I am confused.
I did believe that anything that had a downgrading effect of the value of my unit required my approval.
Hence the three different resolutions in simplicity
Majority Resolution (Neutral Change)
Special Resolution (Positive Change)
Unanimous Resolution (Negative Change)
But your replay was a special resolution can remove / change
Remove 90% of entrance lights
Remove 90% of garden lights
Remove 100% of lockable front foyer entrance doors (3)
Remove 100% of lockable rear entrance doors (6)
Remove 100% of the sound blocking features between the building and the highway
Turn off the external light at midnight with no means of turning on if wanted / required
The simple question was is there anything that cannot be removed under a special resolution
I thought all of the above has a negative impact of the value of my lot and would have required a unanimous resolution.
The only ones attending our AGM is the executive committee plus their friend’s proxies hence the outcome of an AGM will not change anything the EC has done.
This means a majority (special resolution) can remove all the features I purchased the unit for SECURITY and PRIVACY.
This is then clear there is nothing achievable by insisting the rules are adhered to and further actions are a waste of every body’s time as the end result will not be changed and all safety features will remain removed.
As the building now has changed to below my security standard and has lost value I now have to sell at a reduced profit.
I am not arguing about you being right I just refuse to believe I have lost so much value so quickly and so simply.