@matt73 said:
What is there to stop false claims of what was there before or what has/has not changed, if there is no evidence of anything other than the pavers ever existing. When purchasing the property I was under the (allegedly false) impression that the pavers were the baseline.
Even if the pavers were originally installed by the builder their is no requirement for the OC to maintain them a Special Resolution to remove them is perfectly legal if the pavers are on common property.
Same rule applies to any other structure on common property, the exception being an original (or an approved) boundary fence (between lots or lots and common property) where the fencing Act comes into play.