In the case I mentioned above, the plaintiff did not get any damages awarded as was reported here.
That was covered by the member at 24 below;
I do not think that there is justification for the making of order 2. The applicant damaged her vehicle by her own attempts to get out of the car space. Although indirectly the need to do so has been occasioned by the circumstances involving the difficulties of exiting car space 4, the applicant nevertheless, on the particular occasion in question, chose to attempt to manoeuvre the vehicle out of the car space in a manner which she was aware was difficult. In that sense, it was her negligence and not any act or omission of the Owners Corporation which caused the damage…
Sending a notice to comply to the entire building is probably not right and raises a few questions, hopefully no handbags though!