#61819
Jimmy-T
Keymaster
Chat-starter

    I hadn’t really thought of the cost aspect, I must confess.  Those fees are a real deterrent against by-law changes (which may be a good or bad thing).

    I think the schedule of rules idea is good, Something like “Residents must abide by the rules relating to the use of [insert facility here] which may be changed from time to time as minuted by the strata committee and posted on the notice board.”

    The problem with that is that residents can say they didn’t see the latest update. Incredible as it may seem, I recall tenants being let off with a failure to comply with a Notice To Comply because they said they weren’t aware of the by-law even though it was included in the NTC (as it must be).

    Of course, if you were using unenforceable by-laws to deter bad behaviour, you wouldn’t need to register them as they are unenforceable anyway.

    And if you’re saying that even enforceable by-laws can be a waste of time (in your previous post) I have to ask, what’s the point?

    If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.