Thanks Jimmy and Sir Humphrey. I too prefer Canberra’s rules “anyone who could have voted”, assuming it’s on unit entitlements. Then, the motion would have had buckely’s chance of passing. Who is Buckley anyway?
And to set aside the politics. Impossible. An email from the SC was sent to all owners just before the meeting; on the one hand, they criticised and named one owner who had placed a motion on the agenda to repair a small area of common property, falsely suggesting it would cost owners hundreds and thousands of dollars, while on the other hand, subtly informing owners reasons why all the other motions should be accepted. Is this actually legal?
We all voted with our consciences.