What can be done if you find out, and can prove, that a SC member is lying at a meeting?
We’ve got SC members who lie through their teeth as if it is a part of their s 37 duty.
“Due care, diligence and whatever lies are necessary to promote their agenda …”
Same people are responsible for the “code of conduct” for SC meetings which says a SC member should not mislead the committee.
Lying here is about who is saying what, it isn’t a lie if one of your own faction is saying it and loyalty to the faction means you must subscribe to the lie.
It isn’t just lying to the SC. These people are happy to entrench lies in minutes and when our highly capable friends (LOL) at NCAT were asked to make a s 238 order and remove the people from the SC for lying and misleading owners via SC minutes it meet with a big fat NO. That is not serious dysfunction.
Underline that part – lying is not serious dysfunction.
Similar outcome when the OC was found to be lying to NCAT in submission – nothing came of it.
I will give an example of a more recent lie.
We have an owner who played the death threats card.
Claimed to the AGM they had received death threats.
When asked from who all you heard were crickets.
When asked if it was reported to the police all you heard were crickets.
It was an absolute lie but it attracted some sympathy from those who subscribed to the liars factional agenda.
Lies – not much you can do about them except enjoy the division they cause.