#80865
Jimmy-T
Keymaster

    It’s worth noting that, for the purposes of non-discrimination, the Ageing and Disability Commissioner Act groups people with age-related issues along with people with other disabilities.

    It’s also significant that the SSMA section 5 states that changes to common property for accessibility require only a simple majority (not a super-majority as for a special resolution) while section 132C outlines the issues the scheme should consider including “the extent to which the use of the accessibility infrastructure will be available to all or some of the lots in the strata scheme” and “the extent to which not installing the accessibility infrastructure will cause or be likely to cause detriment to be suffered by … the person requesting the installation of the accessibility infrastructure.”

    But there’s another potentially overriding consideration – Safework NSW says that stairs must have at least one handrail if they are narrow and one on each side if they are wider. It also defines stairs as having at least two risers. So it could be that the strata scheme doesn’t have a choice – if there are stairs, there should be a handrail.

    If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.