#82215
Flatchatty
Flatchatter
Chat-starter

    UPDATE:

    • The SM generated and circulated a recent new version of the AGM minutes which listed 4 SC members instead of 3 SC in the original minutes.
    • The SM claimed that all members have requested to be contacted individually (I’m a member and I’ve never made request)
    • The SM claimed that all members requested anonymous voting.
    • The SM claimed that they have a majority to approve the retrospective approval (based on the recently generated AGM minutes.)
    • The SM misrepresented legislation and said the offender can vote.
    • The SM misrepresented Bylaw closes

      I am shocked!