If that fails, you put the same motion on the agenda of your next AGM. If the secretary and or chair baulks at that, there are mechanisms available for removing them from the committee either by a majority vote of owners or via the Tribunal.
LOL to the max at the idea that such a thing would be grounds for a s 238 order.
For those who haven’t been keeping up. In the real world NCAT view s 238 like they do s 237 so you need some serious dysfunction before the Tribunal would intervene.
Witch Hunt.
“The most obvious option is to present a motion to the committee itself, saying that all votes, including who voted for what, should be notified to the committee members.”
I didn’t see that coming so not overly obvious.
If the secretary is part of the problem then do realize the secretary has no obligation to include such a motion on the agenda. Also take onboard that as much as the SC has a impressive degree of flexibility in how it handles its affairs how does one enforce this “policy” should the motion find its way onto an agenda and get majority approval?