Forums Common Property Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #9787 Reply | Quote

    I would like some help regarding who is responsible for fixing problems with water penetration resulting from major renovations of a penthouse in a small building of less than 10 units (in NSW – mod.).

    Unfortunately there is no registered By-law of these works that were done over ten years ago and which I understand should have occurred. The owner, executive committee and strata managers at the time failed to perform than duty of establishing a By-law but seemingly approved the work.

    The renovations comprised of extending the penthouse out and removing the wrap around balcony, building new walls to the exterior building perimeter extending the roof out and doing internal work to all areas. A previous owner did the work and the design faults have just been realized.

    The work done is a dramatic change to the original structure. Who is now responsible for the ongoing maintenance? Should the original design be reinstated or the new owner required to take on the responsibility of fixing the problems or is the Owners Corp having to pay for the remediation or is there insurance that can be claimed for the past incompetence of the executive board or strata manager or is the building certifier at the time responsible?

    The problem is – water leaks into the units below the penthouse and causes staining to the ceilings. The problem has recently been recognised as being due to faulty waterproofing membrane to the windows sills and/or with the tiling of the balcony and internal floors. The problem will be expensive to fix! The windows and tiling were part of the new work.

    Other details are: Our strata has not adopted the LPI memorandum of 2011. The work is outside the 7 year builders warranty.

    I would very much appreciate opinions on who is responsible for the costs of remediation and if we can correct the past and register a By-law for future possibilities.

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #22537 Reply
    kiwipaul
    Flatchatter

      Basically the BC is only responsible for the original structure but in this situation they would have to remove the alterations and return it to the original state. I’m sure the new owner would object to this so you could negotiate with him that the Strata will pay a proportion of the repair if he pays the rest AND a bylaw is registered passing responsibility of the new structure to the lot owner.

      Who actually approved the work the EC or the BC at a GM. The EC doesn’t have the authority to approve improvements so that decision is meaningless but if a GM approved the alterations (and their are minutes to prove it) then you have a much weaker case and would have to pay more and the owner less.

      #22562 Reply
      audreygreenwood
      Flatchatter

        I hope you get the problem fixed soon. It’s not a joke to have to worry about settling all these issues while trying to negotiate who should take responsibility for all of it at the same time. Try your best to get whatever discussions you can out of the moving boxes they probably have stashes somewhere and take it from there. Hopefully the history of things will help to make things clearer.. Good luck!

      Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
      Reply To: Major renovations done without registration of a Bylaw. Who is responsible for remedial work?
      PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

      You can use BBCodes to format your content.
      Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

      Your information:




      Forums Common Property Current Page