#42359
4atRW
Flatchatter
Chat-starter

    Thanks for you advice Flame Tree

    I agree that the by-law seems excessive. I also like the idea of using the AGM motion, but I’m not sure how it would work. The scenario is that the 2 owners (units 1 and 3) who want to go ahead with repairs are happy to pay for them out of their own pockets, but don’t want to pay again (from the Strata sinking fund) if new owners in units 2 and 4 want repairs to be paid for from the Strata sinking fund and a special levy. The by-law seems the only way to protect owners 1 and 3 from potentially paying twice.