THESE changes, in a fairly evenly balanced stratum of conflicting interests of which I’m aware, could be a formula for intermittent skirmishing via GMs. Are they really progress?
You still have to convince a majority of owners to sack the committee member. And the one-year mandatory absence should reduce back and forth “skirmishing”.
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
