I’m not sure whether applying for another order under s232 would require less evidence? For example on the basis that a resolution was passed but that the SC (as opposed to the OC) is refusing to action that resolution.
I would think that failure to follow the instructions of the OC was all the proof that you needed of failure to fulfil a function, which is what 232 is all about.
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
