Jimmy, thanks for the reply and the names of solicitors. The Bannermans article is good news. In the building concerned, the by laws in place are the model ones eg “peaceful enjoyment” and “floor covering”. And both over the years have being breached.
What I cannot understand is that if there is no doubt breaches have occurred (records indicate the unapproved flooring was brought to the SC’s notice several years ago as it was disturbing neighbours and nothing was done about it by the OC), what could a solicitor defending the matter possibly achieve?
Persuading the other side not to continue with the case seems to me to be the only strategy. Or am I mising something?
For the record, we included breaches of ss 37 and 260 that we believe have occurred as well.