#84449
Jimmy-T
Keymaster

    There is a persistent myth in strata that the scheme is not liable for events not covered by strata insurance. Owners have to look at this another way; they have chosen  a policy, probably cheaper, with defined coverage. Which mean  that they are only covered for their statutory liabilities and up to the amount the policy allows.  If the claims are greater than the agreed benefits, and the injured party successfully sues for damages, then the scheme has to find that money from its existing funds or additional levies.

    This is a case you might take to a medical claims specialist lawyer or, preferably, reach an amicable agreement with the owners corporation and save both sides legal costs. So yes, you would have to initiate a separate action against the scheme if you thought you had been unreasonably inadequately compensated.

    If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.