JimmyT said:
Say the even the right thing about the wrong person and you could be entering a world of pain.
I wonder why the 'Owners Corporation' didn't just simply retract what they said and / or apologise? Or deny it was the larger OC's opinion, hanging the 'defendant' out to dry, leaving it as an unprofitable exercise for the lawyers (who are really the villains, let's face it).
And wouldn't resolutions at General Meetings have been required to expose the OC to these type of financial doings? Hard to fathom.
What an astounding and fascinating tale. Any chance of posting more about it?