These objections are spurious and betray a complete lack of understanding of strata law. None of them have any legal validity apart, possibly, from the last which would be impossible to prove. In any case, you can only challenge a 'denied' vote if that vote would have altered the outcome (which is clearly not the case here).
Even the CTTT at its most unpredictable and unreliable would toss this out. You have overwhelming support for this and you can let misguided objections, however legalistic they may sound, get in the way of important decisions.
Point your objector in the direction of Fair Trading (13 32 20) and let them initiate a challenge there, if they wish. Otherwise, full steam ahead.