Forums By-laws and outlaws No Pet Policy By-law Current Page

#30073
Jimmy-T
Keymaster

    I am not particularly in favour of buildings that have blanket “no pets” by-laws, but I am even less in favour of people who buy into buildings with by-laws that they don’t like and then try to force everyone to abide by THEIR rules. 

    Mediation is an obligatory precursor to a Tribunal action for people who want to run a case against other owners.  By not turning up, regardless of what the majority opinion is, you could give the impression that either you don’t care or that you don’t respect the system.

    The owner who wants the dog is obviously planning to go all the way to the tribunal.  What you want is as many signed letters as you can get from owners saying that one of the reasons they bought into the scheme is that they didn’t want to live around pets. 

    That’s all they need to say – going on about barking dogs or fleas or whatever just gives the other side opportunities to pick holes in your argument.

    Even a petition that said “I bought into this scheme because it doesn’t allow pets … and allowing pets would discriminate against me,” would carry a lot of weight.

    Let us know how you go. 

    And no, you probably won’t get costs awarded against the owner unless they delay proceedings, and are otherwise obstructive.

    If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.