Thanks Jimmy, I now better understand the differentiation between short-term accommodation and the lease of a residence, but as Sect 49(1) talks about Special By-Laws not restricting “the devolution of a lot or a transfer, lease, mortgage, or other dealing relating to a lot” I wasn’t so sure about that interpretation.
I guess it’s the fact that short-term rentals are not covered by a lease that nullifies the provisions of Sect 49(1), and that must be the professional interpretation of those eminent legal brains.
Thanks again; all’s now clarified!