› Forums › Common Property › Simple/special resolution › Current Page
In response to the balustrade replacement, which reads that the opponents need without reasonable doubt to prove that it is an upgrade and not a repair, I asked my two motions to be put on the agenda (a. and b). The reply of the strata manager (see below) is, not he or the applicant, but the opponents need to prove it. Please advise
a.That the Strata Manager …… without reasonable doubt supplies evidence and proof that the replacement/modification of the balustrades is a repair and not an upgrade, to rectify his believe that the voting on the motion requires standard and not special resolution.
Submitted by the Owner of unit …….
b) That the initiators of the motion 3.2 c) “Replacement of Balustrades” supply proof without reasonable doubt that the western balustrades of Units 5, 6, 7 & 8 are unsafe to justify the balustrades replacement.
Submitted by the Owner of Unit……
Answer by email to the owners from the strata manager
Going through these motions (3.2.a), the onus should not be on the Strata Manager to prove that it is a standard resolution but on the owner of Unit ….(me) to prove that it is a special resolution as when I added the qualification I had sought advice from several of my fellow strata managers who have all stated that this should be a standard resolution.