Well, after I pointed out that an OC cannot exclude an owner from access to their apartments through the common property, the SM replied with: “The OC is not excluding an owner from access to their apartment through the common property; we are just highlighting that it is an owner’s responsibility to purchase any keys, swipes or remotes to facilitate this access.”
I would have thought that if an OC cannot exclude an owner from access to their apartments it can’t charge to access them either?
This is not about obtaining extra, lost, misplaced or damaged swipes where I agree the owner should pay. It’s replacing a faulty one – that was supplied by the OC.