Thanks Jimmy for the correction. In sealion’s case it would seem that there has been no special levy raised and that the expense has been charged to either the admin or sinking fund. I’d doubt whether the legal counsel would want to wait for that process to take place and the remaining owners to eventually pay up. So shouldn’t sealion be asking that the correct process be followed so that the special levy is struck, and reimbursed to the appropriate fund. He wouldn’t then be charged that levy for his share, and no refund would be involved to himself.