Just before KWP, Austman, PeterC, and any of our other interstaters jump in, I must say that I accept JGOWI’s point about amended Motions and I’ll include that point as another circumstance where an on-line vote may be invalidated, but for the life of me I can’t see the need for on-line participants to submit a proxy in circumstances where a quorum has been achieved at the physical meeting.
Frankly, I was more concerned on this occasion to ensure that the on-line “ballot” closed-off at around the same time as the meeting concluded, so that those personally present couldn’t influence those voting on-line to support specific and maybe contentious points of view.
Anyway, as I said back on post #2, I may finish up in Gaol for being innovative in my methods to encourage our Proprietors to participate in the operations of their Plan, but maybe the Magistrate (or Member) will be kind; I won’t comment further on the grounds that it may incriminate me
.