Committee biasing AGM Motions

› Forums › Strata Committees › Current Page

Create New Reply
  • Creator
    Topic
  • 11/06/2019 at 2:44 pm #38013 Reply | Quote
    Flame Tree (Qld)
    Flatchatter

      I recently submitted three Motions for our upcoming AGM hoping to sensibly correct some issues the current committee of rusted-on members see no issue with.  I was surprised when the meeting motions and other paper work arrived in the post included a 2 page letter stating the committee advised against voting in favor of all 3 of my motions. Their reasons given were disputable and/or factually incorrect. I feel this has potential to unduly influence owners who respond in advance by postal vote before I can  speak to the motions on the day (29 June). I’d be interested in suggestions on if or how I might seek to re-balance this perceived bias. I am in Queensland.

    • Creator
      Topic
    Reply To: Reply #38018 in Committee biasing AGM Motions
    PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information:




    › Forums › Strata Committees › Current Page