- This topic has 6 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by .
-
Topic
-
Good afternoon all,
Last November I raised a query and received a few replies (some quite knowledgeable) but alas the links provided to me by some no longer work.
My question now is slightly different.
The OC is about to repair a balcony (which all agree is structurally defective) for which one owner has exclusive use. At the AGM last year he asked for compensation (a fixed sum up to $5,000) from the OC so he could give his tenants a rent holiday while they put up with the noise from all the jack hammering. This was approved by the OC.
It just dawned on me that my tenants will suffer as well given they live just under where the jack hammering will take place.
My research indicates that the SSMA does not provide for compensation pmts but such pmts can be made if the OC wants to make them.
My question is: what avenues do I have if when I seek identical compensation from the OC, the OC decides not to compensate me for the rent abatement I feel is due to my tenants for putting up with very loud and inconveniencing repairs which singularly benefit one owner and are paid for by the OC?
Thank you.