Forums Common Property Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #10694 Reply | Quote
    TrulEConcerned
    Flatchatter

      At a recent AGM, the majority of owners decided to repair a balcony.

      1. REPAIRS

      The balcony is leaking.

      The balcony is not common property.

      Presumably, regardless of ownership, the leaks have to be fixed.

      (a) Can the EC merely present 2 quotes – for a gold plated repair job costing approx $6,000 per lot owner – to the OC?

      (b) Can my request for an independent engineer/plumber/handyman etc to establish the actual (not assumed) cause of the leaks (and who will not be enriching himself by both diagnosing and doing the repairs) be rejected? (Note in this strata most folk are old and are easily led. Sweet music to the EC).

      (c) If originally the balcony was erected with tiles assuming the role of a membrane, must the OC NOW lay down a new membrane (as is being demanded by interested parties) or can it limit its responsibility to fixing the leaks, perhaps by cheaper means?

      2. COMPENSATION

      The owner of the balcony sought and was granted compensation by the OC for “inconvenience” to him while the balcony repairs take place. Is this legal? And if so, is their a limit to what he the OC can pay him?

      Please advise. Thank you.

    Reply To: Reply #25740 in Compensation for inconvenience
    PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information:




    Forums Common Property Current Page