DIRECT ACTION

› Forums › Common Property › Current Page

Create New Reply
  • Creator
    Topic
  • 29/05/2012 at 4:59 pm #8174 Reply | Quote
    Anonymous

         Our OC has recently replaced a section of fence which was in excellent condition and two attached clotheslines have been refitted at a decreased height which makes them very difficult to use if you are over about 165cms tall (which makes me the only person likely to be affected).  A polite e-mail has attracted the expected non- response from the EC.  Neither the new fence nor the original fitment of the clotheslines was approved by Special Resolution.   I am seriously considering attempting to alter one at minimal expense which would probably result in a somewhat rough looking outcome i.e. bent over nails holding the top of the structure to the fence. My guess is that if when an EC member notices a tradesman would be summoned to return it to the previous location and to be true to the original intent I would have to repeat the alteration.  Personally paying a tradesman to alter it may be wiser but with my share of the OC funds at about $4000 it would leave a bad taste and the EC may well shift it again (yes spite could well be their chief consideration).  This is a “final straw” scenario and I wonder what the downsides could be.   

    • Creator
      Topic
    Reply To: Reply #15639 in DIRECT ACTION
    PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information:




    › Forums › Common Property › Current Page