Forums Strata Committees Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #7413 Reply | Quote
    Anonymous

      Hi Jimmy,

      There are 5 EC members in our strata for this year. 3 office holders (Chairman, Treasurer, Secretary) plus 2 owners who want to be part of the committee. The issue we have is that the Chairman and the Treasurer are usually in agreement on what to vote in favour and what to vote against. The other office holder (treasurer) and the two EC members have decided to vote against anything the Chairman or Treasurer proposes just because they are 3 against two.

      My question to you is: Shouldn't the office holders vote (even if it is 2 against 3) be sufficient to go against the other 3 votes? What is the point of holding a position if the other members have the same voting rights? Can you clarify this for me please

      Kind Rgds

      Muffin  

    Reply To: Reply #14155 in Executive Holders versus EC members
    PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information:




    Forums Strata Committees Current Page