Forums The Professionals Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #83136 Reply | Quote
    Ziggy
    Flatchatter

      At the beginning of February 2026, the owners at our strata scheme were made aware by our new strata manager that the minutes of a general meeting (GM), held in December 2026, had still not been finalised by the parties in attendance.

      At that meeting, there was no secretary in attendance to take notes and neither did the Chairperson, who was an owner not a strata manager. Some owners who attended have forwarded their notes to the new strata manager.

      In fact, the minutes still have not been resolved in favour, although they have been placed an upcoming general meeting for approval, 46 working days after the original GM.

      Is this meeting valid or not? If not, what sections of the Strata Scheme Management Act has it breached?

    Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #83141 Reply
      Jimmy-T
      Keymaster

        “the minutes still have not been resolved in favour”

        What exactly do you mean by that? That a draft has not been approved by the committee? Only a general meeting can approve, amend or reject the minutes of a previous general meeting.

         

        If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
        #83143 Reply
        Ziggy
        Flatchatter
        Chat-starter

          Our former strata manager didn’t hand over voting forms to the new SM. Obviously, a simple voting form is “approve, disapprove, or abstain”. This doesn’t allow for discussion and transparency amongst owners. Those who were there emailed the SM what they think was said.

          By February this year, the minutes still hadn’t been finalised by those in attendance.

          The “minutes” have finally been placed on our upcoming GM and are a mishmash of what might have been said 3 months ago.

          How can this be a true and accurate record of the proceedings of that meeting? In addition, shouldn’t minutes be posted on the Noticeboard and sent to all owners 14 working days after a meeting?

          #83168 Reply
          Jimmy-T
          Keymaster

            Perhaps the simplest thing would be to review all the decisions supposedly made at the prvious AGM and ask owners to vote on them again – that way what was actually said and done at the meeting is irrelevant.  And this time record the meeting – or maybe just the chair’s declarations of votes – and run it through a transcription service like Otter to get an instant and accurate transcript.

            If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
            #83186 Reply
            Quirky
            Flatchatter

              The purpose of the minutes is to record the decisions taken at the general meeting, for each agenda item. If there are doubts about what happened, then the motion to confirm the minutes put to the next meeting can resolve any issues. The easiest approach is to look at the previous Agenda and mark which were approved, or not (if a motion does not receive sufficient votes (ie 51% for a normal resolution) then it fails. If the members who attended can’t recall the outcome, that mark consider those items as being deferred or voted down. Add any items that should be resolved to the following meeting’s agenda, with the explanatory note, that this item was brought forward from the previous meeting.

              A general meeting is “valid” if there is a quorum present, and it begins and ends. If all the agenda item decisions are unknown, then consider the decision for each one as being deferred, and take this up at the next meeting.

              Note that the minutes are in essence a list of the answers to the agenda items – basically “yes” “no” or “deferred”. The minutes should not record discussions, comments, questions etc – just the decisions taken. And later meetings can revisit those decisions and change them or reassert them.

              #83189 Reply
              Jimmy-T
              Keymaster

                A general meeting is “valid” if there is a quorum present, and it begins and ends. If all the agenda item decisions are unknown, then consider the decision for each one as being deferred, and take this up at the next meeting.

                If the numbers aren’t there at the start of a meeting to achieve a quorum, the chair just has to wait half an hour then declare it quorate.

                If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
                #83191 Reply
                Ziggy
                Flatchatter
                Chat-starter

                  I could probably pay to find out who voted for and against to each motion, if the new strata manager has them.

                  But there are other issues i.e. the minutes have only been tabled for approval four months after the meeting was held. And the minutes were never placed on the noticeboard.

                  In addition, the minutes to be resolved as “true and accurate” on the December meeting agenda were actually wrong. They were minutes from the AGM, not the previous general meeting that followed. There were also fierce arguments about proxy votes. Two people in attendance, had two separate proxies each.

                  The bottom line is, it was a complete debacle.

                Viewing 6 replies - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
                Reply To: Reply #83189 in How can we approve minutes of a previous meeting when no one was taking notes?
                PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

                You can use BBCodes to format your content.
                Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

                Your information:




                Forums The Professionals Current Page