- This topic has 1 reply, 1 voice, and was last updated 10 months, 4 weeks ago by .
-
Topic
-
You’ve probably heard whispers about the NSW Transport Noise Reduction Grants — the government’s well-intentioned initiative to help residents plagued by transport noise. New double-glazed windows, shiny new balcony doors, and a quieter life — all paid for by taxpayers. But here’s the catch: there’s only $4 million available each year.
In our building, one lucky owner — living in one of the quietest units — somehow managed to secure the grant. Thirty-five other owners are now demanding the same treatment. Who wouldn’t? Free double glazing!
But let’s be honest — does this pass the “fairness test”? What about the pensioner in Mascot who lives under a flight path, shaking teacups every time a jet takes off — and has no idea this obscure grant even exists?
Our strata committee has raised serious questions:
- Was this application in line with the intent of the grant — to help those truly suffering from transport noise?
- Shouldn’t the lots facing the major highway be prioritised instead?
- And now the kicker: does the recipient have to comply with the Design and Building Practitioners Act (NSW) 2020?
Some owners argue yes, however the works exceed $5,000, so compliance is mandatory. Others argue no — “it’s a grant, not strata money.”
No one wants to pay for legal advice, and the committee is divided. Should a by-law be required? Should Owners Corporation funds ever be used?
What started as a simple government grant has exploded into a strata showdown, raising questions of equity, compliance, and ethics.
The NSW Transport Grant — a blessing or a bureaucratic bombshell?
-
Replies
-
Before we go any further I want to point out that this is almost certainly related to this thread and, if so, that’s where it should have been posted. If that’s not the case, please let me know.Apart from that, when I read this at first, not yet making that connection, it struck me that this was an attempt to justify a dog-in-a-manger response to a legitimate application for work approval. Okay, so one owner was smarter than the others and got a grant that they didn’t know about. Big deal!For those who haven’t read the other thread, our Flatchatter was awarded a government grant to install new double-glazed balcony doors, the OC approved the work but the committee is refusing to let the work go ahead. The government won’t release the grant until the committee allows the work.What really needs to happen here is that all parties stop taking pot shots at each other and just get on with doing what needs to be done so EVERYBODY can enjoy apartment living the way they should. This should not be about who did or said what, or why, in the past. It’s time to draw a line under all this and resolve it as amicably as possible. No harm, no foul. Now back to the post in question…
You’ve probably heard whispers about the NSW Transport Noise Reduction Grants … In our building, one lucky owner — living in one of the quietest units — somehow managed to secure the grant. Thirty-five other owners are now demanding the same treatment. Who wouldn’t? Free double glazing!
Okay, so what’s the problem?
What about the pensioner in Mascot who lives under a flight path, shaking teacups every time a jet takes off — and has no idea this obscure grant even exists?
That has absolutely nothing to do with your block and should not influence decisions your committee makes.
Our strata committee has raised serious questions: Was this application in line with the intent of the grant — to help those truly suffering from transport noise?
That’s not for the committee to decide – the department that approved the grant makes that decision, whether you like it or not is irrelevant.
Shouldn’t the lots facing the major highway be prioritised instead?
Did they apply for the grant and were refused?
And now the kicker: does the recipient have to comply with the Design and Building Practitioners Act (NSW) 2020? Some owners argue yes, however the works exceed $5,000, so compliance is mandatory. Others argue no — “it’s a grant, not strata money.”
It doesn’t matter where the money came from. If the cost of the work is over a prescribed amount and involves building work, the DBPA applies.
No one wants to pay for legal advice, and the committee is divided. Should a by-law be required? Should Owners Corporation funds ever be used?
What would you be using OC funds for? To fight this at NCAT?
What started as a simple government grant has exploded into a strata showdown, raising questions of equity, compliance, and ethics.
If it’s a simple government grant, why has no one else applied for or received it? Equity, compliance and ethics? It seems to me that the only thing in question here is compliance, and if the installation has been approved, the strata committee should comply. From the outside, it seems like envy rather than equity is in play here, and personal vendettas rather than good practice. Tell me I’m wrong and I will correct ththe misconception here.
There is no “explosion” … just a “small war, not many dead.”
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.