Perplexed by pergolas

› Forums › By-laws and outlaws › Current Page

Create New Reply
  • Creator
    Topic
  • 25/05/2016 at 10:51 am #10467 Reply | Quote
    Aitch
    Flatchatter

      An owners corporation proposes to take responsibility for the repair, painting and replacement of some existing privately owned pergolas in the complex by the passage of a by-law using s65A of the SSMA “….for the purpose of improving or enhancing the common property”.

      s65A(1)(a) of the SSMA refers to making additions to the common property. Any views on whether such action would be a valid addition to the common property?

      s65A(1)(b) of the SSMA refers to the alteration of the common property. I believe that this section refers to the alteration of something which is already common property and not altering the common property by adding something to it. Any views on this thought?

      s65(1)(c) of the SSMA refers to the erection of a new structure on common property and this could hardly be relevant?

    • Creator
      Topic
    Reply To: Reply #25070 in Perplexed by pergolas
    PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information:




    › Forums › By-laws and outlaws › Current Page