Forums Smoke gets in your eyes Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #71161 Reply | Quote
    Jimmy-T
    Keymaster

      I am due to be on ABC radio in Canberra tomorrow morning talking about smoke drift from unit balconies.  Does anyone know if any resident in the ACT has taken a case to the Tribunal? If so, how did they go?

      If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
    Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #71163 Reply
      Sir Humphrey
      Flatchatter

        I am not aware of any Tribunal decisions on smoke drift. I just did a search with just ‘smoke’ as the search term and only found two decisions that were to do with damage to property by smoking tenants.

        #71205 Reply
        Jimmy-T
        Keymaster
        Chat-starter

          Thanks. I came up dry too.

          If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
          #71586 Reply
          Pittcarts
          Flatchatter

            I am sorry for the delay in responding, and have missed your deadline. However, there are now two cases in NSW that have been decided by NCAT over the last 12 months that limit cigarette smoke drift on Multi Housing Balconies:

            They are:

            Pittman v Newport [2022] NSWCATCD

            And

            https://acsl.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Shaw-v-Euen-2023-NSWCATCD-68-29-June-2023-.pdf

            Again, sorry for the delay.

          Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
          Reply To: Reply #71163 in Smoke drift in Canberra
          PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

          You can use BBCodes to format your content.
          Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

          Your information:




          Forums Smoke gets in your eyes Current Page