Forum Replies Created

Viewing 2 replies - 31 through 32 (of 32 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: AGM minutes #21146
    alinka
    Flatchatter
    Chat-starter

      @Whale said:
      That would complicate the issue in my opinion, but in any event it’s the O/C that has the absolute responsibility to decide if there’s a maintenance problem with its property, and if there is a problem, how to best address it – it shouldn’t abrogate that!

      In addition, it’s in fact easier for an O/C to add and collect an additional fee, that’s been agreed to and minuted at an AGM, as a separate line item on an Owner’s Levy Contributions Invoice than it is for that O/C to reimburse an Owner for a  cost that they’ve incurred via a third-party.

      It really comes back to how certain your O/C is that there’s no structural problem with the balcony – perhaps find out the costs of an opinion as opposed to a full-blown report and go from there; it may be cheaper than you think and at least then your O/C would have some basis for its decision.

      Perhaps have a chat with Integrated Building Consultancy – they’re sponsors of FlatChat.

      This is a very good advise. Thank you so much.

      alinka

      in reply to: AGM minutes #21144
      alinka
      Flatchatter
      Chat-starter

        Thank you for your reply. 

        Not to complicate the issue, can the OC ask the owner of the particular balcony to engage a structural engineer at his cost. If any problems should be identified, the OC will reimburse him for it and surly deal with the problem. Would not it be easier to do it this way, to avoid eventuall problem to get the money back from the owner.

         

      Viewing 2 replies - 31 through 32 (of 32 total)