Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 3,661 through 3,675 (of 7,906 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Timeframe to court judgment #35697
    Jimmy-T
    Keymaster

      Did you use a lawyer who specialises in recovering unpaid levies.  They will know.  If you didn’t, did you realise that the reasonable costs of debt recovery can be added to the original claim?

      If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
      in reply to: Were we bullied? #35695
      Jimmy-T
      Keymaster

        This is taking over the whole Forum. Obviously , my message about not bickering publicly didn’t take.  I am shutting this down right now. Any attempts to re-launch this under other topics will result in a ban from the Forum.

        If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
        in reply to: Compulsory SM and Strata Committees #35693
        Jimmy-T
        Keymaster

          Obviously , my message about not bickering publicly didn’t take.  I am shutting this down right now.

          If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
          in reply to: Kean announces tighter laws for apartment builders #35712
          Jimmy-T
          Keymaster
          Chat-starter

            This is now being discussed in the Flat Chat Forum

            If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
            in reply to: Compulsory Strata Manager appointed 'secretly' #35682
            Jimmy-T
            Keymaster

              OK, I’m shutting this down.  You folks (Shackelton and Newlsie) need to accept whatever has been decided at NCAT, switch off your inner bush lawyer and maybe sit down and agree to disagree.  Public bickering doesn’t do this Forum any good and I’m guessing it’s not helpful for your community, either.

              If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
              in reply to: Carpark management contract #35681
              Jimmy-T
              Keymaster

                Agreed.  But I don’t see how one person or business can “own the Owners Corporation” unless they own all the lots in the building.

                If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
                in reply to: Carpark management contract #35675
                Jimmy-T
                Keymaster

                  Sounds like a rort.  Speak to a lawyer (because you’re going to need one eventually anyway).

                  If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
                  Jimmy-T
                  Keymaster
                  Chat-starter

                    Good point.  And, as I said recently in the context of the Opal debacle, if you were able to go back to your developer and hand back the keys, saying “I’m sorry, this apartment isn’t what I was promised in the sales literature.” That would tighten up quality control somewhat.

                    If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
                    in reply to: Unreasonable refusal of pet application? #35665
                    Jimmy-T
                    Keymaster

                      Braveheart’s post is mostly right in its general thrust but a bit shaky on detail.

                      The OP says approval was given by the agent ‘and obviously the owner’. However … it is not clear that a specific request was put to the landlord and that written approval was then provided by the landlord. The rental agent has no authority to give consent.

                      Really?  Can we assume that the rental agent has “no authority to give consent”? If the rental agent has the authority to sign the lease then they can also authorise other aspects of the lease.  FYI, in Victoria, landlords can’t unreasonably refuse consent for pets.

                      Assuming that the OP did in fact receive approval in writing from the landlord, the next step is to write to the OC via the Strata Manager …

                      They could just write directly to the strata committee … especially if there is no strata manager. And it depends on the by-law in place.  One of the two optional by-laws in the model by-laws in NSW says the resident only needs to inform the OC that they have a pet.

                      … requesting permission for the animal, including a copy of the written consent of the landlord, and as much detail as possible about the animal as to its size, breed, character, vaccinations, micro-chipping, how waste will be managed, how it will be exercised and so on.

                      Again, the demand for any such detail would depend on the by-laws and “house rules”. There is no default legal requirement for such detail.

                      What should not happen is that the prospective tenant just moves in with the animal without written consent of the landlord and without written permission from the OC, and simply pretend that fait accompli will prevail.

                      Well, yes to the former (if you include agents) and “depends” to the latter which is subject to whatever by-laws are in place.

                      This is a cyclical ploy …

                      I assume you meant “cynical”. Sometimes people just don’t know – especially if they are getting mixed messages and incorrect information.  That’s why it’s important for Owners Corps to make it clear what their polices are, and the by-laws that relate to them.

                       

                      If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
                      in reply to: Is a side gate common property? #35650
                      Jimmy-T
                      Keymaster

                        Fences and gates are basically governed by the terms of the fencing Act.  If the fence separates lot property from common property then the costs are shared  50-50.  If they separate two lots, costs are 50-50 between lots and (I think) if the fence separates lot property from non-common property (e.g. it’s an outside fence), the costs belong entirely to the OC (although I would need to check that).

                        On the question of establishing via a by-law that the the fences are common property, what difference does it make since all four of you have to pay, one way or the other?

                        If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
                        in reply to: NCAT TRIBUNAL EXPERIENCE #35645
                        Jimmy-T
                        Keymaster

                          But nothing …

                          If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
                          in reply to: Garage and water flows #35637
                          Jimmy-T
                          Keymaster

                            The Owners Corp has an absolute duty to repair and maintain common property, regardless of whose fault it is.  The ongoing debate over flammable cladding proves that even if it’s not the OC’s “fault”, it’s ultimately their responsibility.

                            So, if you can establish that similar flaws have been repaired by the OC previously (indicating that it was accepted as a defect in common property) then you can offer them the two options – either they fix it, expediently, or they refuse, you take them to the Tribunal, they waste money on lawyers and strata managers … and then they fix it (and you don’t have to pay a share of the costs of them defending your case).

                            If you want get bush lawyer on them, quote Section 106 and  Section 232 of the Act  

                            If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
                            in reply to: NCAT TRIBUNAL EXPERIENCE #35620
                            Jimmy-T
                            Keymaster

                              That would be right here.

                              If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
                              in reply to: Strata manager chaos #35613
                              Jimmy-T
                              Keymaster

                                Of course the statutory manager can set the levies – otherwise they wouldn’t be able to manage the building.  You can appoint someone to view the documents on your behalf.  And if you are unhappy with your strata manager, next time don’t go for a statuory appointment, just ask for NCAT orders to have them removed (but you’d better have good reason).

                                You might want to look at hiring a strata advocate to represent you like Nick penny (nickp@intensive-care.com.au) or the team at Strata Answers.

                                If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
                                in reply to: Compulsory Strata Manager appointed 'secretly' #35610
                                Jimmy-T
                                Keymaster

                                  This is very irritating, arguing the same case across two topics.

                                  And it’s ducks, not ducts.

                                  If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
                                Viewing 15 replies - 3,661 through 3,675 (of 7,906 total)