Forum Replies Created
-
Replies
-
UPDATE: There is fairly inexpensive technology available that employs facial detection (rather than facial recognition) which is to say, it recognises there is a human face in view but doesn’t necessarily recognise who it belongs to. It could be programmed to respond to that.
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
people learn to wear caps and look down to make it hard to get facial. It is something of a weak reed.
Good point but, the immigration security gates at the airport make me take my hat and glasses off. If it’s such a significant problem, perhaps a system that won’t activate the bell push until it can see a face might work (if such a thing even exists in civilian life).
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
Can anyone think of any other ingress and egress services?
This reminds me of the building in Sydney’s CBD that introduced facial recognition to curb overcrowding. All well and good until one woman grabbed her husband’s keys while she went out to buy milk. The computer image trieggered by the key didn’t match the one on its camera and not only was she locked out, but the system cancelled the key too.
In any case, residents must be able to allow visitors into the block, which would bypass any other constraints and efforts to curb that would probably be breaches of the law, as mentioned above.
A big CCTV warning sign would, I think, be a pretty effective (and inexpensive) deterrent for the clients and courtesans alike.
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
Maybe one answer is to tell all owners before any of them get into debt that there could be serious consequences for falling too far behind in their levies.
In that case, they can talk about a payment plan before things get too serious
OR
- Be hit with 10 per cent mandatory penalty interest rates, as dictated by strata law.
- Face having to pay what they owe plus ALL the costs of debt recovery (and there are specialist strata debt recovery firms out there who will do that for you).
- Possibly have their rent income garnisheed (diverted to the strata scheme) until the debt is paid off.
- Possibly have to sell their property as a “distressed” sale if they can’t meet all their financial commitments.
This may sound like a threat but it’s only fair to all owners – including those who pay on time – that everyone knows that not paying your levies is not the free ride that it may seem.
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
Apologies for misinformation provided in an earlier post; the owners corp has two weeks in which to publish the minutes of a meeting (which should include the results of a vote).
Section 22 of Schedule 1 of the Strata Schemes Management Act sets out the time frame in which general meetings minutes must be published and votes must be declared.
If possible, the chair should declare the result at the meeting at which the vote has taken place.
Otherwise it would be included in the minutes of the meeting which must be published, one way or another, within 14 days of the meeting taking place.
That means in a scheme of fewer than 100 lots, every owner should be given a copy of the minutes. In a large scheme (>100 lots) they should be given to any owner on request.
The maximum fine for failure to do so is $1100.(1) Records to be kept
The owners corporation must keep full and accurate minutes of its meetings that include minutes of all motions passed at its meetings.
(2) Distribution of minutes and records of motions
Within 14 days after a meeting, the owners corporation must provide copies of the minutes of the meeting in the following manner—
(a) by giving each member of the strata committee a copy,
(b) by giving each owner a copy, if the strata scheme is not a large strata scheme,
(c) by giving an owner a copy, if the strata scheme is a large strata scheme and the owner requests a copy within the period of 14 days.
Maximum penalty—5 penalty units.If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
It read to change the colour ‘from, and to’ and not as a motion with alternatives ‘A leave it, B change to new”
The alternative to leave it be – the status quo – is implied in a vote to accept or reject a colour change. Vote no to a change to whatever colour that’s been suggested implies a vote against any colour change – at least until a new vote is proposed on a preferred colour change.
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
If you don’t attend general meetings in person or by proxy, you won’t get much sympathy on this website
Depends on the reason for non-attendance. People have jobs or are away. Strata managers have been known to schedule general meetings to suit their office hours, not the availability of owners to attend.
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
Security cameras (real or fake) and a prominent notice warning “you may be filmed” at most-used access points would provide deterrence. The problem isn’t the sex-workers, it’s their clients.
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
I can just see an OC in the Supreme Court. The OC, “but your Honour no one has established it is common property and we have no idea where the common property is”.
And this would only happen if someone was disputing it. Simple logic. How much information do you require the members of your committee to have to hand at any given time? All they need to know is how to access it, if and when required.
I really can’t see the problem here, unless all records of the building have disappeared from every location where they might be held.
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
vote results have been provided to the Strata Committee, yet the owners are not able to see these results.
If the document exists then you can apply to your strata manager to go and see it. There’s a statutory fee of about $35 for doing so, so club together with other concerned owners to pay it.
This post has been edited in light of new information – see below.
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
The OC via the strata mgr replied threatening me with a costs order at NCAT. (I did not mention NCAT).
The strata manager may have quite reasonably assumed you were planning to go to NCAT since, as you point out yourself, there is no other reason for applying for mediation in a case like this, especially where the two parties are highly unlikely to agree to a compromise.
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
See new answer below.
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
How can I show that I have exhausted all my options?
If you are in NSW and they have failed or refused to act for two months or more, then seek mediation at Fair Trading with a view to taking action at NCAT, seeking orders under a section 232 “failure to fulfil statutory duties”.
You might also suggest that if the strata manager doesn’t explain the facts of strata life to the chair, then you will also seek the appointment of a statutory manager under Section 238.
That should get their attention, at least.
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
I see no reason that NCAT could possibly award the opaque, unresponsive and secretive OC a farthing, let alone what they insinuate they will seek.
If the OC can show that you have no case, and that you knew you had no case but, for instance, merely held a grudge because of behaviour you found unacceptable, that could turn out to be quite a lot of farthings in your debit column. You need to be very sure of your grounds before they “lawyer up” and those billable hours start adding up to your disadvantage. Talk to a lawyer.
If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.