I seem to remember you stating in another post that the complainants’ submission in your matter had contained some “porkies”, and if that’s the case your best (if not only) response would be to provide statements, ideally evidentiary, to rebut those – not to proliferate them.
Remember though you’re not dealing with a Court, and that change of acronym or otherwise, you’re still dealing with the CTTT, where the Legislative Council’s inquiry found their procedures “complex and bewildering” and where the strangest decisions too often emerged!