Forums NCAT – the NSW Tribunal Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #9341 Reply | Quote
    Millie
    Flatchatter

      When one lodges a response to a NCAT/CTTT Submission is it OK to fill it full of porkies or, as in a court case, would this be considered purjury?

      What happens if one does this – is there any comeback/blowback?

      Just wondering….

    Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #20862 Reply
      Whale
      Flatchatter

        I seem to remember you stating in another post that the complainants’ submission in your matter had contained some “porkies”, and if that’s the case your best (if not only) response would be to provide statements, ideally evidentiary, to rebut those – not to proliferate them.

        Remember though you’re not dealing with a Court, and that change of acronym or otherwise, you’re still dealing with the CTTT, where the Legislative Council’s inquiry found their procedures “complex and bewildering” and where the strangest decisions too often emerged!

        #20864 Reply
        Millie
        Flatchatter
        Chat-starter

          Thanks Whale. The other way around. Evidence was presented and it was the respondents who replied with false statements.

        Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
        Reply To: NCAT/CTTT Submissions and Responses
        PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

        You can use BBCodes to format your content.
        Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

        Your information:




        Forums NCAT – the NSW Tribunal Current Page