New laws: compulsory training for committees

iStock-1759507816-e1732161047236.jpg

Back to school or quit - that could soon be the choice for strata committee members.

Compulsory training of strata committee members, properly estimated levies for new blocks and off-the plan purchasers being allowed to rescind their sales contracts if they have been duped into accepting embedded network contracts; these are just three of the most prominent of the many and profound changes to NSW Strata law proposed in a Bill tabled in Parliament this week

Fair Trading Minister Anoulak Chanthivong introduced the Strata Schemes Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 to the NSW Parliament on Tuesday with little fuss or  fanfare – and that could be because it contains some of the most profound changes to strata culture in the state since the current laws were passed in 2015.

For instance, the proposal to have compulsory training for strata committee members and strict guidelines for how chairs should conduct of committee meetings didn’t even merit a passing mention. And neither did the plan to bring strata contracts under Australian consumer law.

However, if the Bill gets through parliament relatively unscathed, critics say the amendments could see strata committee members quit in droves rather than undergo training and committee chairs and secretaries step down rather than comply with the detailed responsibilities outlined in the amended Act.

That said, those changes will be welcomed by many in strata who have suffered at the hands of ill-informed and wilfully ignorant strata committees, and bullied and excluded by chairs who play fast and loose with the rules.

Schedule 1[8] of the proposed Act “expands the duties and obligations of strata committee members … to require members of strata committees to complete training, and to make clear that a member who fails to complete the required training will cease to be a member of the committee.”

Not only that, strata committee chairs will be required by law to ensure “that the agenda is followed at meetings, that order is maintained at meetings, to encourage discussion at meetings and to facilitate the fair, constructive and open discussion of matters at meetings.”

The amended legislation turns the focus from strata managers – who have been the subject of much criticism lately – squarely on to their clients, specifically the strata committees and their officers, as well as developers.

It means ordinary members will be obliged to:  

  • exercise [their] functions with honesty and fairness, with due care and diligence and for the benefit, as far as practicable, of the owners corporation
  • to comply with the Strata Schemes Management Act and regulations under the SSMA,
  • to only use or disclose information obtained as a member, including information about an owner of a lot, as required to carry out strata committee functions, or as authorised or required by law,
  • to not behave in a way that unreasonably affects a person’s lawful use or enjoyment of a lot in the strata scheme or the common property.

Strata officers – chair, secretaries and treasurers – will be able to be removed from those roles by a simple majority vote of owners at a general meeting. Previously that required a special resolution.

Owners will now have six rather than two years to take action against owners corps that have failed in their statutory duty to maintain and repair common property.

Underquoted levies

Another significant change will be that developers will not be allowed to deliberately underquote the levies for a new block sold off the plan, which will have to independently assessed.

Penalties on developers will be increased for failure to hold the first AGM within two months of the end of the initial period of a new block (when one-third of properties have been sold), and for failure to provide owners with all relevant documents before that meeting.

There are other provisions regarding levies debts which would allow the Owners Corps to arrange payment plans for overdue levies or, indeed, refuse to do so.  Also the window for the recovery of unpaid levies, interest charges and debt recovery costs would be increased from 21 days to 30 days.

When it comes to renovations, the required by-laws must include a reference to who will be responsible for the maintenance of affected common property (at the moment it defaults to the owners corp if the renovator is not specifically given that responsibility).

Also, OCs that reject a renovation proposal will have to explain why the plan was rejected.  Failure to do so within three months of making the decision will result in the proposal being deemed to have been approved.

The threshold for approving accessibility related infrastructure changes  (such as wheelchair ramps) will be lowered to a simple majority instead of a special resolution, and changing the appearance of the building will no longer be a valid reason for refusal unless the building is heritage listed.

The Bill also includes amendments to the Community Land Management Act and the Conveyancing Act 1919, among other related legislation.

In the latter case, the proposed amendments “ensure that for lots sold by off the plan contracts, if there is an inaccuracy in the disclosure statement … relating to the association scheme or strata scheme including, or being likely to include, an exclusive supply network, the vendor must notify the purchaser and the purchaser may have an option to rescind the contract.”

The proposed amendment also sets out the description of exclusive supply (or embedded) networks that must be included in the disclosure statement for off-the-plan contracts.

And, for the first time, strata contracts with suppliers and service providers will come under consumer law, with all the implications that will have for one-sided contracts, including the strata management agreements, that strata owners have foisted on them.

You can read the Bill in its entirety HERE, but bear in mind it still has to pass a second reading in Parliament and then undergo a process of working out how the changes will be implemented before it all comes into effect.

Softly, softly: How the changes were announced

This, below, was the press release issued by Fair Trading earlier this week – short on details and no mention of compulsory training for committee members at all.

The Minns Labor Government has introduced its third wave of strata reforms to the NSW Parliament today, continuing its work to confront the state’s housing challenges and address cost of living pressures.

More than 1.2 million people are already living in strata communities in NSW, and that number is set to grow under the Government’s comprehensive plan to build a better NSW.

The latest round of reforms builds on our commitment to working across all levels of Government and industry to encourage people to live and invest in strata.

The latest changes will:

  • Strengthen developer accountability by requiring initial levies to be independently certified;
  • Ensure a robust initial maintenance schedule is in place for new builds;
  • Protect owners corporations from unfair contract terms;
  • Help owners corporations in repairing and maintaining common property;
  • Support the uptake of sustainability infrastructure in strata schemes such as solar panels, electric vehicle charging, and efficient water fixtures; and
  • Give property owners more options to pay levies when facing financial stress.

With cost of living pressures biting many households, the sensible changes being proposed will require owners corporations to estimate how much money will be needed for the capital works fund each year, alongside their annual energy and water consumption and expenditure in common areas.

Owners corporations will also be better supported through increased professional standards and accountability for managing agents and building managers, improvements to strata management agreements, and improved committee governance. 

The new laws also clamp down on developers who offer prospective buyers initially low strata levies that increase significantly in the second and successive years. By strengthening the accountability of developers we can avoid “bill shock” for residents.

This legislation follows the recent launch of the Strata Living Guide which provides strata property owners and prospective buyers clear advice in plain English on a range of topics aimed at improving decision-making in strata communities.

The new Guide has practical ‘how to’ information for those living in strata properties, such as how to run strata meetings and other key strata processes, how to manage strata finances, and how to raise issues.

The Guide also helpfully suggests ways to go about getting things done such as regular or emergency repairs and approvals for renovations, resolving disputes, and managing relationships with the owners corporation and strata manager.

These reforms build on the Government’s ongoing work to make it easier for people living in strata properties to keep pets and assistance animals, and greater transparency requirements and higher penalties for strata managing agents who do the wrong thing.

“The Minns Labor Government is continuing to improve the regulatory framework we need to build better homes and communities for the people of NSW,” said Fair Trading Minister Anoulack Chanthivong.

“These reforms will ensure strata laws are modern, fit for purpose, and hold those involved accountable for their actions.

“Through the significant changes we have made to strata laws, we are getting the settings right to ensure people have the confidence to invest and live in strata properties. 

“These new laws follow the recent launch of the Strata Living Guide which provides clear advice to people living in the 86,000 strata schemes in NSW, which will help them govern their strata schemes constructively and effectively.”

For more information visit: https://www.nsw.gov.au/housing-and-construction/strata

Newsletter

To subscribe (for free) to our weekly Flat Chat newsletter, bringing you links to our  latest posts, just click HERE.

Flat Chat Strata Forum Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #76970
    Jimmy-T
    Keymaster

      New laws tabled this week will force strata committee members to undergo training, levies in new blocks will have to be realistic and embedded network scams could see sales cancelled.

      [See the full post at: New laws: compulsory training for committees]

      The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
    Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #77048
      kaindub
      Flatchatter

        With the increasing size of strata buildings, its increasingly more difficult and time consuming to be a committee member.

        I see a future where we have professional committee members, similar to the way we have independent members of boards of public companies.

        These people would be elected by the owners as their committee and paid accordingly.

        These people would be highly trained in strata ( but would excluded strata managers acting in such a role in order to ensure independence) and act in the interests of the owners.

         

        #77072
        tina
        Flatchatter

          I am looking ahead and wondering who is going to provide the strata committee training?

          Will it be an on-line course provided by Fair Trading?  Read some slides.  Answer ten multiple choice questions and print my PDF certificate?

          I fear it is going to be an accredited course provided by Strata Community Association and it will cost thousands of dollars.

          If Flat Chat provided strata committee training, I would do it.

          #77080
          kaindub
          Flatchatter

            tina

            SCA used to provide a course for committee members. If I recall it was a few hours face to face and the cost was about $85

            But I get what you are saying. As soon as anything becomes mandatory, the providers get in and gouge.

            I think that any training has to be better than none (as the case now) but it may discourage time poor but competent potential committee members.

            #77087
            Jimmy-T
            Keymaster
            Chat-starter

              How will we be able to know that committee members have actually received training? Online registration? Easy to fake. Physical attendance at a class? Somewhat onerous and expensive.

              Is this in fact the end of strata committees as we know them?  Will it result in shifting more power and responsibility to strata managers?

              For what it’s worth, I’d rather have a good strata manager than a bad committee any day.

              The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
              #77155
              StrataChair
              Flatchatter

                Yes, I think the training is problematic.

                It risks being legalistic and about compliance. And if SCA gets near it, it’s about doing things that are convenient for agents.

                What’s really needed on committees is a commitment to wanting to live in a well-run community and being willing to do your bit to make that happen.

                So maybe some training that puts the emphasis on that, and on how to reach consensus decisions.

                Our adversarial legal and political system gets us used to black/white, good/bad options.

                The legal obligations have to be there, but I think it’s critical they’re framed as a way to ensure you have a harmonious, safe, well-maintained home. Which, by the way, will maintain its market value.

                As for paid committee members, we started doing that years ago in both the buildings I’m involved in, using the honorarium provision in the legislation. You wouldn’t make a living from it, but the amounts are enough to acknowledge the time involved and have been approved without dissent at each AGM.

                #77192
                Magritte
                Flatchatter

                  Queensland

                  I am thinking that minimal committee members is the go, we have moved from NSW Strata to Queensland Body Corporate and Community Management, and I have just had an incident/maintenance where we wrote straight to the management. No waiting for committee meetings no need to be nice to the committee members to get maintenance done.  Our committee has no email address, so I see no reason for anymore then 3 members with no egos.

                  #77194
                  Jimmy-T
                  Keymaster
                  Chat-starter

                    I have just had an incident/maintenance where we wrote straight to the management. No waiting for committee meetings no need to be nice to the committee members

                    There is a disconnect in SOME strata schemes between SOME strata managers, SOME committees and SOME owners. The SOME total (sorry!) is that too many owners feel that their strata committees and strata managers are operating out of self-interest.  Pay committee members for the meetings they attend and “officers” for the work they do and then you can impose professional standards.

                    The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
                    #77197
                    scotlandx
                    Strataguru

                      I don’t know what the answer to this is – in our scheme of 9 lots, there is not a single person other than me who has the faintest idea how Strata law works, or anything about the framework generally. 2 of the owners on the Committee have been owners for more than 30 years. They are very good at complaining.

                      So that leaves me and the strata manager. At the AGM recently I was abused for an extended period of time by one of those owners, for having the nerve to progress fixing a few things, all of which she had voted for. She then accused me of a conflict of interest and said I shouldn’t be allowed to vote on any matters. I am not sure how much more I can take.

                      I think even if you had a training requirement it would be dumbed down, and people like my neighbours would just tick the box and continue on their merry way.

                       

                       

                      #77285
                      Mortimer T
                      Flatchatter

                        Thanks for you comment.

                        The new training requirements are full of good intent, but as with so many legislated compulsions its likely to spawn yet another ‘training’ industry that doesn’t provide much of benefit other than dollars into the trainers pockets. Look at the compulsory 10-year sinking fund planning requirement (NSW) which has delivered for most Strata Schemes, off the peg spreadsheet forecast documents that provide no meaningful or applicable content at all. Good committees already did the right thing, others still haven’t got a clue. Similarly the compulsory inclusion of child safety lock motions in annual meeting agendas.

                      Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
                      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

                      Flat Chat Strata Forum Current Page

                      Flat Chat Strata Forum Current Page

                      scroll to top