Facts and faults – how the DBPA works and why

Confused-builder-2.avif

Myths and mysteries - does anyone really know how the DBPA works?

There’s been a lot of anger, frustration and confusion around the Design and Building Practitioners Act, including claims that it inflates the cost of often simple projects by applying unnecessary approval by professionals, their fees and their additional insurances.

There have also been allegations that some remediation professionals have been feather-bedding the projects to increase their costs unnecessarily.

We asked Fair Trading and Building Commission to respond to some of the complaints.  The following was sent last week from a spokesperson at the NSW Building Commission.

This is their response:

Ensuring adequate support and protection for homeowners remains a regulatory priority for both Building Commission NSW And NSW Fair Trading.

The Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (DBP Act) only requires the specific areas of remediation requested by an owner to meet current Building Code of Australia (BCA) standards.

For example, if a unit owner opts to repair internal laundry waterproofing there is no requirement under the DBP Act for balcony balustrades to be upgraded even if they are non-compliant with current BCA standards.

In addition, the DBP Act has not changed the requirement or the way in which remedial work can be undertaken to comply with the (BCA). These requirements are not new, and have been in place under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Act (EP&A Act) since the late 1990s.

In many cases remedial work is excluded from the DBP Act altogether where it meets the definition of ‘exempt development’ under the State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008.

Building Commission NSW is taking a proactive an approach to clear up confusion on issues relating to the DBP Act by working with peak bodies representing owners, strata managers and remedial contractors.

Detailed information relating to the application of the DBP Act for remedial work has also been made available on the NSW Government website.

Building Commission NSW also has powers to take disciplinary action against registered building and design practitioners by issuing cautions, fines or suspending or cancelling registrations where they are found to be engaging in conduct falling short of the standard of competence and integrity the public expects.

This below standard conduct may include deliberately providing misleading advice in relation to scopes of remedial work required under the DBP Act.

Homeowners concerned about the application of the DBP Act in relation to remedial work on their building are encouraged to contact Building Commission NSW on 13 27 00. They can also make a complaint via the NSW Government website.

Separately, apartment owners concerned about high levies are also encouraged to contact NSW Fair Trading on 13 32 30 or visit the NSW Government website to understand their rights.

Newsletter

To subscribe (for free) to our weekly Flat Chat newsletter, bringing you links to our  latest posts, just click HERE.

Forums Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #83127 Reply | Quote
    Jimmy-T
    Keymaster

      The DBPA, designed to protect us from dodgy builders, has exposed us to additional costs. The Building Commission explains why.

      [See the full post at: Facts and faults – how the DBPA works and why]

      If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
    Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #83132 Reply
      Jimmy-T
      Keymaster
      Chat-starter

        Some background:

        Apartment buildings are the only building class where the remedial requirements of the DBPA currently apply.
        The Act introduced requirements for remedial work in apartment buildings covering critical construction elements, such as:
        • Load bearing components, like slabs, beams, columns and structural walls
        • Waterproofing, like balconies, rooves, bathrooms and membranes
        • Fire safety, like fire doors, cladding interfaces and passive fire protection
        • Building enclosure / façade systems, like external walls and windows.
        This rectification work often needs to comply with the BCA, which improves the quality of remedial work by including the latest safety requirements.
        However, some of the internal and external building work generally defined as exempt development under the State Environmental Planning Policy includes:
        • A doorway, wall, ceiling, or floor lining
        • A bathroom or kitchen
        • A built-in fixture such as vanity, cupboard, wardrobe
        • An existing sanitary fixture (e.g. a grease trap or similar)
        • Painting, plastering, cement rendering, cladding, attaching fittings or decorative work,
        • The replacement of an external window, glazing areas or a door (other than those on bush fire prone land),
        • The repair to or replacement of a non-structural wall or roof cladding,
        • The installation of a security screen or grill to a door or window or a security door,
        • The repair to or replacement of a balustrade.
        A general guide on remedial work for apartments and information on exemptions can be found here.  For a guide on ‘exempt development’ requirements, see here.
        If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
        #83193 Reply
        Strata Ken
        Flatchatter

          So, it seems that the problem are that engineers are specifying excessive requirements, and then there aren’t enough waterproofers so they are all pushing the prices up. One quote for our remediation was half of what would be charged to build a whole new block of units.

          My reading of the rules is that bathrooms are exempt unless there is more than one dwelling, in which case the paper work needs to be done. I haven’t gone through all the rules, but one difficult requirement is that waterproofing has to be done as a single sheet. Much fun because the bathrooms in mystery strata have tiles to the ceiling, resulting in a big job, to fix what is needed which is probably just the base of the shower. Or is that interpretation correct?

          #83195 Reply
          Jimmy-T
          Keymaster
          Chat-starter

            ‘…bathrooms are exempt unless there is more than one dwelling,’

            Which would mean that unit block bathrooms are not exempt. So how does that apply to townhouse bathrooms? We need a document like the “Who’s responsible?”guide that came out a few years ago.  My insider at the Building Commission said that one problem is that the BCA was written to apply to technologies many of which are long out of date and then the builders try to apply the letter of the law absolutely strictly.

            If you want to be alerted when anyone replies to your posts or responds to this topic, please register and login, then you will be able to subscribe to the topic. The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers. NB: Longer threads may spill over to additional pages - look for the numbers on the bottom right, under the last post.
          Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
          Reply To: Facts and faults – how the DBPA works and why
          PLEASE ... If your property is not in NSW, mention its location (state). Don't identify companies or individuals by name. Don't mention or promote your company or services. Keep acronyms and initials to a minimum. Please, don’t use “quote” unless there is a specific point to which you wish to refer, then highlight (define) that specific passage before you click on "quote". Otherwise just use reply. THANKS.

          You can use BBCodes to format your content.
          Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

          Your information:




          Forums Current Page

          Forums Current Page

          scroll to top